The recently released Epstein files present historic Cryptocurrency disclosures of his initial fascination with computer cash and significant crypto traders. The reports, published on January 30, reveal that Epstein exchanged messages with Bitcoin founders and investors as far back as crypto became mainstream.The files disseminated through the world press put a new spin on the early crypto-discussions and ideological struggles. The fact that Epstein was excited about talking with Bitcoin founders and commenting on philosophical matters indicates that he followed the potential of cryptocurrency.The Epstein files Bitcoin transactions contain the evaluation of Bitcoin’s ability as a payment system, and philosophical discussions about Bitcoin’s identity.Epstein showed critical interest in Bitcoin, calling it brilliant in a message in 2011, but with serious downsides. He was briefed on Bitcoin in 2013 by a forwarded email. These messages indicate that he followed crypto discussions when the majority of investors were not paying enough attention.They also presuppose the premature relationships of the scandalous personalities with the new blockchain industry. The files provide crypto network insights that create new questions regarding the early digitally-native money dialogues.Among the most shocking Cryptocurrency disclosures was a pitch to a Saudi royal advisor in 2016. Epstein suggested two electronic currencies, such as a sharia coin for the Muslim markets and another digital currency that relates to the idea of Bitcoin.He quoted that he had spoken to some of the earliest creators of Bitcoin, who showed a lot of enthusiasm regarding the concept of a sharia-friendly crypto. This pitch demonstrates that Epstein tried to affect the integration of digital money frameworks that have regional and cultural orientations.It is also one of the pioneering concepts that demonstrates interest in the modular application of blockchain outside speculative markets.The Epstein files contain a 2014 conversation with billionaire investor Peter Thiel in which they discussed the identity of Bitcoin. Epstein stated that there was minimal consensus on what Bitcoin is and compared the debate to a problematic analogy on identity.Their interaction shows the ideological divisions regarding the role of Bitcoin: store of value, currency or property. These debates constitute an important component of crypto network knowledge since they were associated with philosophical battles that influenced the subsequent discourses.Although Epstein was curious, in a short email exchange in 2017, he refused to financially support Bitcoin when it was on the upswing. When questioned about whether a purchase of Bitcoin was worth it, his answer was one word, and it was No.This implies that his previous fascination was not reflected in his belief in the investment value of Bitcoin. It also highlights the contradictory and complicated essence of his interaction with digital assets.